SENSOR COMPARISON
OmniVision OV50D vs Samsung ISOCELL JN1
Samsung ISOCELL JN1 has 1.1× the light-gathering area of OmniVision OV50D. Samsung ISOCELL JN1 uses larger 0.64 µm pixels versus 0.6 µm.
- OmniVision OV50D 4.9 × 3.7 mm · 18 mm²
- Samsung ISOCELL JN1 5.2 × 3.9 mm · 21 mm²
Drawn to scale from pixel pitch × resolution (or optical format when pitch is unknown). Dashed outline: 1-inch type (13.2 × 8.8 mm).
| Spec | OmniVision OV50D | Samsung ISOCELL JN1 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor maker | OmniVision | Samsung |
| Resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Optical format | 1/2.88" | 1/2.76" |
| Sensor area | 18 mm² | 21 mm² |
| Dimensions | 4.9 × 3.7 mm | 5.2 × 3.9 mm |
| Pixel pitch | 0.6 µm | 0.64 µm |
| Pixel binning | 4-in-1 | 4-in-1 |
| Autofocus | PDAF (2x2 ML) | Double SuperPD |
| HDR | Stagger HDR | Inter-scene DCG |
| Mapped phones | 4 | 6 |
| First phone year | 2024 | 2022 |
PHONES
Where each sensor is used
OmniVision OV50D
- OnePlus 15 Rear Ultra-wide
- Realme GT8 Pro Rear Ultra-wide
- Nubia RedMagic 10 Pro Rear Ultra-wide
- Nubia Z70 Ultra Rear Ultra-wide
Samsung ISOCELL JN1
- HONOR Magic 7 Unknown
- Xiaomi 15 Rear Ultra-wide
- vivo X200 Rear Ultra-wide
- Xiaomi 14 Rear Telephoto + Rear Ultra-wide
- OnePlus 10 Pro Rear Ultra-wide
- Xiaomi 13 Pro Rear Telephoto + Rear Ultra-wide